Democrats step up hardball tactics in Supreme Court fight | TheHill - The Hill

Senate Democrats are ramping up their hardball tactics in the fight over President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump signs bill averting shutdown after brief funding lapse Privacy, civil rights groups demand transparency from Amazon on election data breaches Facebook takes down Trump campaign ads tying refugees to coronavirus MORE’s Supreme Court nominee.

Democrats aren’t able to block the nomination on their own, but they are pulling procedural levers to gum up the Senate in protest of the GOP plan to confirm Judge Amy Coney Barrett before the Nov. 3 election.

The multi-pronged effort, including limiting committee meetings and taking the rare step of forcing votes, is prompting Republican warnings that Democrats could keep the Senate in Washington during the final weeks of the 2020 campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Chuck is leading us in … considering procedural options. Some he announces in advance, some for obvious reasons he doesn’t, and I think he’s trying to make it clear that the process created by [Senate Majority Leader Mitch] McConnell for this nominee is such an outrage that the American people have to be reminded ,” said Sen. Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinComey defends FBI Russia probe from GOP criticism Comey on Trump finances: Debt can make officials 'vulnerable to coercion by an adversary' Meeting Trump Supreme Court pick a bridge too far for some Democrats MORE (Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat.

Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyRomney, Murphy 'extremely concerned' about threats to withdraw from US Embassy in Baghdad GOP online donor platform offering supporters 'Notorious A.C.B.' shirts Democratic senator calls for 'more flexible' medical supply chain to counter pandemics MORE (D-Conn.) said Democrats were willing to use what limited options they have to buy themselves more time to keep the focus on the impact of a 6-3 conservative majority, which they warn will be the death knell for the Obama-era Affordable Care Act. 

“There are many of us who believe that they’re trying to ram this nominee through. ...So we feel like we need to extend this process,” he said. “So I would expect that we’ll use the tactics that we have.”

The fight comes as Democrats are powerless to stop Republicans from confirming Barrett without the support of at least four GOP senators—a herculean task given Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGOP senators pan debate: 'S---show,' 'awful,' 'embarrassment' 'One more serious try' on COVID-19 relief yields progress but no deal The Hill's Campaign Report: Debate fallout l Trump clarifies remarks on Proud Boys l Down to the wire in South Carolina MORE’s grip on the caucus.

But they are facing fierce pressure from their base and wings of the caucus to use every option on the table to oppose Barrett’s nomination and show that it is not “business as usual,” with Republicans primed to set a new record for the closest to Election Day a Supreme Court nominee has been confirmed. Though other nominees will have been confirmed faster, they were further out from a presidential election.

“Look we’re going to have to find our way through this. ...The caucus will work through these things one issue at a time. But there’s a lot of passion about using every procedural tool we’ve got to slow this down,” said Sen. Chris CoonsChristopher (Chris) Andrew CoonsThe Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by JobsOhio - Trump's tax return bombshell Coons: 'Defies comprehension' why Trump continues push to 'strip away' protections for pre-existing conditions Two Judiciary Democrats say they will not meet with Trump's Supreme Court pick MORE (D-Del.) about the prospect of forcing the Senate to stay in session after this week. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Fueling Democratic angst, Republicans refused to give Judge Merrick GarlandMerrick Brian GarlandMeeting Trump Supreme Court pick a bridge too far for some Democrats Barrett ad war exceeds Kavanaugh fight Warren won't meet with Barrett, calling Trump's nomination an 'illegitimate power grab' MORE, then-President Obama’s final Supreme Court nominee, a hearing or a vote eight months out from the 2016 election; Republicans argue the difference in 2020 — that they control both the White House and Senate — is a significant distinction. 

But Democrats have drawn a hard-line against calls to boycott Barrett’s hearing, warning it would only result in her nomination moving more quickly and with softball questions being asked during the high-profile, days-long hearing that’s slated to commence on Oct. 12.

Democrats are largely aligning themselves with Schumer’s use of the Democrats’ limited procedural options, after a rocky start last week, arguing they can’t treat Barrett’s nomination as a normal Supreme Court pick.

“We can’t do business as usual in a situation that’s so extraordinary where the Republicans are breaking their word to rush a nominee so they can kill the Affordable Care Act,” said Sen. Tim KaineTimothy (Tim) Michael KaineFears grow of chaotic election Trump taps Amy Coney Barrett for Supreme Court, setting up confirmation sprint Supreme Court fight pushes Senate toward brink MORE (D-Va.).

The approach by Democrats has earned them praise from activists urging them to go all in on Barrett’s nomination.

Adam Jentleson, a long time staffer for then-Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry Mason ReidMeeting Trump Supreme Court pick a bridge too far for some Democrats GOP senators confident Trump pick to be confirmed by November Durbin: Democrats can 'slow' Supreme Court confirmation 'perhaps a matter of hours, maybe days at most' MORE (D-Nev.), said the procedural options would help brand Barrett’s nomination as “illegitimate.”

“New sign of hardball from Schumer & Senate Dems. ...They forced McConnell to recess the Senate until noon as a defensive move against Dem threats to invoke the 2 hour rule. This plus filing cloture on the ACA bill today = applying pressure & forcing GOP mistakes. Good stuff,” he tweeted.

Democrats began invoking archaic Senate procedures last week when they drew upon the so-called “two hour rule,” which limits the ability for committees to meet after two hours. The rule was invoked again on Wednesday, with Republicans trying to get it by not bringing the Senate into session until noon.

Asked about using the tactic, Sen. Joe ManchinJoseph (Joe) ManchinManchin: Trump's West Virginia ballot fraud claim 'just plain wrong' Senate Democrats want to avoid Kavanaugh 2.0 Energy innovation bill can deliver jobs and climate progress MORE (D-W.Va.) defended the decision, telling reporters: "We don't do anything around here anyway, we've got plenty of time to do meetings.”

Since then they’ve stepped up their efforts.

Schumer, in an extremely rare step, was able to tee up a procedural vote for as soon as Thursday on a bill that would prevent the Justice Department from arguing in courts that the Affordable Care Act should be struck down. Democrats view health care as their best weapon against Barrett because they believe she will provide a vote to strike down the 2010 law.

“Leader McConnell and all my Republican colleagues will have an opportunity to set the record straight with their vote,” Schumer said about the procedural vote.

Typically only McConnell, as majority leader, determines what legislation comes to the floor for debate and a vote, absent unanimous consent. The late Sen. Tom CoburnThomas (Tom) Allen CoburnCOVID response shows a way forward on private gun sale checks Inspector general independence must be a bipartisan priority in 2020 Congress must protect federal watchdogs MORE (R-Okla.), without informing either Senate leaders, used the same procedural level in 2011 to force an amendment vote related to ethanol.

Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneSenate passes spending bill to avert shutdown hours before deadline The Hill's Morning Report - Fight night: Trump, Biden hurl insults in nasty debate Meeting Trump Supreme Court pick a bridge too far for some Democrats MORE (S.D.), the No. 2 GOP senator, said he was told that a similar tactic was used a decade ago, in an apparent reference to Schumer.

“This is kind of in the category of pulling a fast one. And pretty uncharacteristic of the normal decorum in the Senate….Obviously they’re sore about the Supreme Court nomination and doing everything they can to retaliate,” he said.

Democrats have not tipped their hand on whether they will try to keep the Senate in session past this week. But GOP leadership is warning their members that they could be forced to be in Washington and off the campaign trail. Kaine said as of Wednesday evening it was still under discussion.

But Thune said, based on conversations with Democratic senators, he expects the Senate to be in next week, and McConnell teed up several votes on judicial nominees for next week. 

“Unfortunately looks like it,” Thune said. “But don’t blame us, it’s the Democrats.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)

"tactic" - Google News
October 01, 2020 at 05:00PM
https://ift.tt/3cLHmqF

Democrats step up hardball tactics in Supreme Court fight | TheHill - The Hill
"tactic" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2NLbO9d
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Bagikan Berita Ini